The family of Justine Damond Ruszczyk responded to the overturning of Mohamed Noor's third-degree murder conviction. (FOX 9)
ST. PAUL, Minn. (FOX 9) - Following the Minnesota Supreme Court's decision to overturn the third degree murder conviction for former Minneapolis Police Officer Mohamed Noor, the family of the victim, Justine Ruszczyk Damond has issued a response.
Damond was shot and killed by Noor in an alleyway behind her south Minneapolis home after calling police to report a possible assault in 2017.
The Ruszczyk family said they are "heartbroken" with the Supreme Court's opinion does not count as murder under Minnesota law.
This browser does not support the Video element.
Mohamed Noor case: Minnesota Supreme Court reverses 3rd-degree murder conviction
The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled to overturn the third-degree murder conviction of former Minneapolis police officer Mohamed Noor in the deadly 2017 shooting of Justine Ruszczyk Damond.
Noor was sentenced to 12 years in prison for third-degree murder and second-degree manslaughter, while being acquitted of second-degree murder.
With the conviction for third-degree murder being dropped, the case will go back to the Hennepin County judge for a new sentence based on Noor’s conviction for second-degree manslaughter. The charge has a presumed sentence of four years according to Minnesota's sentencing guidelines, meaning Noor could be released by the end of the year.
In their statement, the Ruszczyk family said they are looking to the trial court to sentence Noor for manslaughter "equitably, but harshly, in a manner that reflects the loss which our family, Justine’s friends and the entire Minneapolis community continue to endure."
Ruszczyk family statement
Our family woke this morning to news of the Minnesota Supreme Court’s decision that Mohamed Noor’s depraved and senseless shooting of our beloved Justine does not count as murder under Minnesota law. We are again heartbroken, because we agreed with the trial court, lower appellate court, and, most importantly, the jury of Minnesota residents who believed it does. Their voices should be respected. It remains for Noor to be resentenced for his conviction of second-degree manslaughter, a conviction even he does not dispute. While his new punishment may be reduced from the 12.5 years currently on record, our family knows that Noor’s conduct is just as reprehensible today as when he killed her in 2017. The Supreme Court’s opinion simply cannot change that. We look now to the trial court to sentence Noor for manslaughter equitably, but harshly, in a manner that reflects the loss which our family, Justine’s friends and the entire Minneapolis community continue to endure.
The attorney for the Ruszczyk family, Robert Bennet, also released a statement reading:
What the Ruszczyks wanted, what the jury wanted and what society should want is accountability and justice–and by that, they mean that the punishment should fit the crime. There is no logical reason for someone who employed murderous means "directed with particularity at the person who was killed"–in this case, Justine–should be punished less than someone who causes the death of the same person with merely "a generalized indifference to human life." By that logic, Noor should remain in prison for a good deal longer than his lawyers posit.